Nice clean layout — gives the impression of order, but I kept wondering how meaning survives under scale pressure. Enterprise RAG always looks great on architecture diagrams… until the inputs start fracturing. The moment you pull structured + unstructured together (especially Excel + docs + user logs), retrieval starts drifting into ghost segments — like it technically works, but the shape of the question doesn’t quite return. At some point we stopped asking “is this accurate?” and started asking “is this semantically reassembled?” Because the failure wasn’t always in the retrieval, it was in the deformation of what was *retrieved as a shape*. Anyway — if you're modeling this in motion, curious how you handle re-binding logic between hops. Feels like the hard part isn't flow control, it's meaning continuity.